Likely solution: STATUS QUO, MIDDLE PATH or REFERENDUM?
STATUS QUO
Converting the LoC, which was called ceasefire line before the Shimla agreement, into a permanent border and recognising Islamabad's legitimacy over territory it controls. What it would mean for India
- It dovetails with PM Manmohan Singh's "no-change-of-borders" solution
- It could allow India to focus on internal arrangements with the Kashmiris
- It all but nullifies Parliament's 1994 resolution seeking to reclaim PoK
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Goes against Islamabad's traditional stand on the implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions to ascertain the people's will on final resolution
- Would enable it to concentrate on nation-building rather than embroiled in a draining conflict
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Bad news for separatists
- Bad news for secular nationalists such as the JKLF, which seeks independent, sovereign status for undivided Kashmir
THE MIDDLE PATH
- Former Pakistan ruler Pervez Musharraf's 'out-of-the-box' formula, seeking to satisfy all parties and requiring all parties partially to step back
It seeks
- To demilitarize conflict-ridden parts of Kashmir
- Curb militant aspects of the "freedom struggle"
- Introduce self-rule and a joint management mechanism to oversee it
What it would mean for India
- In line with Delhi's stand that it wouldn't agree to change of the borders
- Fear of increased cross-border terrorism
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Fits Islamabad's stand that it can't accept the LoC as a permanent border
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Acceptable to Kashmiri separatists
- Acceptable to chief minister Omar Abdullah
- Is seen to have elements of the state opposition People's Democratic Party's Self-rule formula
EUROPEAN MODELS
Solutions to Europe's many, successive 'Kashmir' disputes, such as Trieste, Northern Ireland, Sough Tyrol and Aaland. Each solution was based on
self-rule, greater economic access and open borders between the divided regions. Each conflict ended with the party in political control retaining this while the other was given economic access. In the
Kashmir dispute, New Delhi could have political control and Pakistan given economic access.
The state would have open borders
What it would mean for India
- Critics say it would mean more cross-border terrorism, difficult to sell domestically post-26/11
- In line with Prime Minister Singh's belief that greater people-to-people contact make borders irrelevant anyway
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Might be willing provided it continues with
Musharraf-era Kashmir policy
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Might find it viable, especially after demonstrating
overwhelming support for the opening of trade and bus routes across divided Kashmir
REFERENDUM
A plebiscite, under UN auspices, offering the choice of merging with India or Pakistan
What it would mean for India
- An outdated, possibly unworkable option in the changed realities of the region today
- Goes against News Delhi's position on the issue
What it would mean for Pakistan
- This has been Islamabad's long-held position on the issue
- Pakistan might find it hard to fulfil one of the basic
conditions before a plebiscite is held -- vacating portions of Kashmir that it occupies
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Anathema to Kashmiri nationalists because it does not offer the 'independence' option
ABROGATION OF ARTICLE 370
Stripping J&K of its special status for its "complete integration with India''
What it would mean for India
- A key demand of the opposition BJP
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Outright rejection
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Well supported in Jammu's Hindu-dominated areas and addresses their resentment to deals between the Centre and Kashmiri Muslims, which they regard as a "fait accompli"
AUTONOMY
Revoking all legislation enacted by Delhi and made applicable to J&K from 1953; greater autonomy for the state; devolution of more powers to the state to address Kashmiri "alienation". The PM's Working Group on Kashmir recommended restoration of
autonomy "to the extent possible" earlier this year
What it would mean for India
- It's within the purview of the Indian constitution
- The Union Cabinet rejected the J&K Assembly's autonomy resolution in 2000, saying it sets "the clock back and reverses the natural process of harmonizing the aspirations of the people of J&K with the integrity of the nation"
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Rejects the formula as it has no stake in it
- What it would mean for Kashmiris Is the main election plank of the ruling National Conference
- Rejected by Jammu-based and separatist outfits
Sir Owen Dixon's Formula
The former UN Kashmir representative suggested the "disputed territory's" division into three and separate plebiscites
What it would mean for India
- J&K's division along religious lines unacceptable to New Delhi
What it would mean for Pakistan
- In line with Pakistan's stand on the issue
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Unacceptable to Kashmiri nationalists and Jammu-based parties
Text: Sameer Arshad, Times of India
'Kashmir is too complex for a cut and paste solution. It's a multi-dimensional problem and needs a bit of most of the solutions'
Mehbooba Mufti, PDP Leader
"Every imaginable solution has been forwarded (but) India and Pakistan see themselves, as too weak to make significant concessions, fearful that to do so would lead to more demands, and a slippery slope"
Stephen Cohen South Asia Expert
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
Converting the LoC, which was called ceasefire line before the Shimla agreement, into a permanent border and recognising Islamabad's legitimacy over territory it controls. What it would mean for India
- It dovetails with PM Manmohan Singh's "no-change-of-borders" solution
- It could allow India to focus on internal arrangements with the Kashmiris
- It all but nullifies Parliament's 1994 resolution seeking to reclaim PoK
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Goes against Islamabad's traditional stand on the implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions to ascertain the people's will on final resolution
- Would enable it to concentrate on nation-building rather than embroiled in a draining conflict
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Bad news for separatists
- Bad news for secular nationalists such as the JKLF, which seeks independent, sovereign status for undivided Kashmir
THE MIDDLE PATH
- Former Pakistan ruler Pervez Musharraf's 'out-of-the-box' formula, seeking to satisfy all parties and requiring all parties partially to step back
It seeks
- To demilitarize conflict-ridden parts of Kashmir
- Curb militant aspects of the "freedom struggle"
- Introduce self-rule and a joint management mechanism to oversee it
What it would mean for India
- In line with Delhi's stand that it wouldn't agree to change of the borders
- Fear of increased cross-border terrorism
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Fits Islamabad's stand that it can't accept the LoC as a permanent border
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Acceptable to Kashmiri separatists
- Acceptable to chief minister Omar Abdullah
- Is seen to have elements of the state opposition People's Democratic Party's Self-rule formula
EUROPEAN MODELS
Solutions to Europe's many, successive 'Kashmir' disputes, such as Trieste, Northern Ireland, Sough Tyrol and Aaland. Each solution was based on
self-rule, greater economic access and open borders between the divided regions. Each conflict ended with the party in political control retaining this while the other was given economic access. In the
Kashmir dispute, New Delhi could have political control and Pakistan given economic access.
The state would have open borders
What it would mean for India
- Critics say it would mean more cross-border terrorism, difficult to sell domestically post-26/11
- In line with Prime Minister Singh's belief that greater people-to-people contact make borders irrelevant anyway
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Might be willing provided it continues with
Musharraf-era Kashmir policy
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Might find it viable, especially after demonstrating
overwhelming support for the opening of trade and bus routes across divided Kashmir
REFERENDUM
A plebiscite, under UN auspices, offering the choice of merging with India or Pakistan
What it would mean for India
- An outdated, possibly unworkable option in the changed realities of the region today
- Goes against News Delhi's position on the issue
What it would mean for Pakistan
- This has been Islamabad's long-held position on the issue
- Pakistan might find it hard to fulfil one of the basic
conditions before a plebiscite is held -- vacating portions of Kashmir that it occupies
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Anathema to Kashmiri nationalists because it does not offer the 'independence' option
ABROGATION OF ARTICLE 370
Stripping J&K of its special status for its "complete integration with India''
What it would mean for India
- A key demand of the opposition BJP
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Outright rejection
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Well supported in Jammu's Hindu-dominated areas and addresses their resentment to deals between the Centre and Kashmiri Muslims, which they regard as a "fait accompli"
AUTONOMY
Revoking all legislation enacted by Delhi and made applicable to J&K from 1953; greater autonomy for the state; devolution of more powers to the state to address Kashmiri "alienation". The PM's Working Group on Kashmir recommended restoration of
autonomy "to the extent possible" earlier this year
What it would mean for India
- It's within the purview of the Indian constitution
- The Union Cabinet rejected the J&K Assembly's autonomy resolution in 2000, saying it sets "the clock back and reverses the natural process of harmonizing the aspirations of the people of J&K with the integrity of the nation"
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Rejects the formula as it has no stake in it
- What it would mean for Kashmiris Is the main election plank of the ruling National Conference
- Rejected by Jammu-based and separatist outfits
Sir Owen Dixon's Formula
The former UN Kashmir representative suggested the "disputed territory's" division into three and separate plebiscites
What it would mean for India
- J&K's division along religious lines unacceptable to New Delhi
What it would mean for Pakistan
- In line with Pakistan's stand on the issue
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Unacceptable to Kashmiri nationalists and Jammu-based parties
Text: Sameer Arshad, Times of India
'Kashmir is too complex for a cut and paste solution. It's a multi-dimensional problem and needs a bit of most of the solutions'
Mehbooba Mufti, PDP Leader
"Every imaginable solution has been forwarded (but) India and Pakistan see themselves, as too weak to make significant concessions, fearful that to do so would lead to more demands, and a slippery slope"
Stephen Cohen South Asia Expert
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
Linking hands, across political fences
Bangalore-based musician Sakuntala Narasimhan recently visited Karachi - and found another home
"So how was your trip to Karachi? How was the conference?" m .....more
Bangalore-based musician Sakuntala Narasimhan recently visited Karachi - and found another home"So how was your trip to Karachi? How was the conference?" m .....more
Aman ki smasha
By Bachi Karkaria
At the Wagah border, jingoistic crowds from both sides gather every evening to cheer/boo the belligerent posturing of the Indian and Pakistani .....more
By Bachi KarkariaAt the Wagah border, jingoistic crowds from both sides gather every evening to cheer/boo the belligerent posturing of the Indian and Pakistani .....more
If music be the food of peace - play on!
Cross-border appreciation for Pakistani singers...
Borders and boundaries cannot contain creativity and talent. This is nowhere more obvious than in the India-P .....more
Cross-border appreciation for Pakistani singers...Borders and boundaries cannot contain creativity and talent. This is nowhere more obvious than in the India-P .....more
COST OF CONFLICT - VII: Diplomatic costs of conflict
Semu Bhatt
India and Pakistan view each other's diplomatic initiatives with great suspicion, constantly negating each other rather than furthering their own cau .....more
Semu BhattIndia and Pakistan view each other's diplomatic initiatives with great suspicion, constantly negating each other rather than furthering their own cau .....more
Aisam's new cause
Aman ki Asha Ambassador Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi is already known for his championing the cause of peace. After meeting unbeaten champ Esther Vergeer, he has another cause
.....more
Aman ki Asha Ambassador Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi is already known for his championing the cause of peace. After meeting unbeaten champ Esther Vergeer, he has another cause
.....more
Aman ki Asha Bookshelf
A selection of some books that we believe further the cause of peace and understanding between Pakistan and India
Out of the Nuclear Shadow
Edited by .....more
A selection of some books that we believe further the cause of peace and understanding between Pakistan and IndiaOut of the Nuclear Shadow
Edited by .....more
Page 117 of 178
Special Editions
more editions
The News on Sunday Special Report: India Pakistan prisoners
We probably didn't need to do this Special Report. Newspaper stories don't matter when it comes to Indians in Pakistani jails and vice versa. In fact, 'vice versa' sums it up. We do to them what they do to us.
Except when the two countries decide to begin talking, yet again! This time a little before the foreign secretary level talks, some Pakistani prisoners were released by India (and vice versa must have happened) and some more were release....read more
Blog
more
For the past 2 years the Jang Group and Geo have been working on a project of great national interest; one that we hope will help usher in an era of peace and prosperity in the country and indeed, in the region. And one that hopefully all Pakistanis can be proud of.
The Jang Group has entered into an agreement with the Times of India Group, the largest media group of India, to campaign for peace betw
Global Media
Comments