Likely solution: STATUS QUO, MIDDLE PATH or REFERENDUM?
STATUS QUO
Converting the LoC, which was called ceasefire line before the Shimla agreement, into a permanent border and recognising Islamabad's legitimacy over territory it controls. What it would mean for India
- It dovetails with PM Manmohan Singh's "no-change-of-borders" solution
- It could allow India to focus on internal arrangements with the Kashmiris
- It all but nullifies Parliament's 1994 resolution seeking to reclaim PoK
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Goes against Islamabad's traditional stand on the implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions to ascertain the people's will on final resolution
- Would enable it to concentrate on nation-building rather than embroiled in a draining conflict
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Bad news for separatists
- Bad news for secular nationalists such as the JKLF, which seeks independent, sovereign status for undivided Kashmir
THE MIDDLE PATH
- Former Pakistan ruler Pervez Musharraf's 'out-of-the-box' formula, seeking to satisfy all parties and requiring all parties partially to step back
It seeks
- To demilitarize conflict-ridden parts of Kashmir
- Curb militant aspects of the "freedom struggle"
- Introduce self-rule and a joint management mechanism to oversee it
What it would mean for India
- In line with Delhi's stand that it wouldn't agree to change of the borders
- Fear of increased cross-border terrorism
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Fits Islamabad's stand that it can't accept the LoC as a permanent border
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Acceptable to Kashmiri separatists
- Acceptable to chief minister Omar Abdullah
- Is seen to have elements of the state opposition People's Democratic Party's Self-rule formula
EUROPEAN MODELS
Solutions to Europe's many, successive 'Kashmir' disputes, such as Trieste, Northern Ireland, Sough Tyrol and Aaland. Each solution was based on
self-rule, greater economic access and open borders between the divided regions. Each conflict ended with the party in political control retaining this while the other was given economic access. In the
Kashmir dispute, New Delhi could have political control and Pakistan given economic access.
The state would have open borders
What it would mean for India
- Critics say it would mean more cross-border terrorism, difficult to sell domestically post-26/11
- In line with Prime Minister Singh's belief that greater people-to-people contact make borders irrelevant anyway
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Might be willing provided it continues with
Musharraf-era Kashmir policy
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Might find it viable, especially after demonstrating
overwhelming support for the opening of trade and bus routes across divided Kashmir
REFERENDUM
A plebiscite, under UN auspices, offering the choice of merging with India or Pakistan
What it would mean for India
- An outdated, possibly unworkable option in the changed realities of the region today
- Goes against News Delhi's position on the issue
What it would mean for Pakistan
- This has been Islamabad's long-held position on the issue
- Pakistan might find it hard to fulfil one of the basic
conditions before a plebiscite is held -- vacating portions of Kashmir that it occupies
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Anathema to Kashmiri nationalists because it does not offer the 'independence' option
ABROGATION OF ARTICLE 370
Stripping J&K of its special status for its "complete integration with India''
What it would mean for India
- A key demand of the opposition BJP
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Outright rejection
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Well supported in Jammu's Hindu-dominated areas and addresses their resentment to deals between the Centre and Kashmiri Muslims, which they regard as a "fait accompli"
AUTONOMY
Revoking all legislation enacted by Delhi and made applicable to J&K from 1953; greater autonomy for the state; devolution of more powers to the state to address Kashmiri "alienation". The PM's Working Group on Kashmir recommended restoration of
autonomy "to the extent possible" earlier this year
What it would mean for India
- It's within the purview of the Indian constitution
- The Union Cabinet rejected the J&K Assembly's autonomy resolution in 2000, saying it sets "the clock back and reverses the natural process of harmonizing the aspirations of the people of J&K with the integrity of the nation"
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Rejects the formula as it has no stake in it
- What it would mean for Kashmiris Is the main election plank of the ruling National Conference
- Rejected by Jammu-based and separatist outfits
Sir Owen Dixon's Formula
The former UN Kashmir representative suggested the "disputed territory's" division into three and separate plebiscites
What it would mean for India
- J&K's division along religious lines unacceptable to New Delhi
What it would mean for Pakistan
- In line with Pakistan's stand on the issue
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Unacceptable to Kashmiri nationalists and Jammu-based parties
Text: Sameer Arshad, Times of India
'Kashmir is too complex for a cut and paste solution. It's a multi-dimensional problem and needs a bit of most of the solutions'
Mehbooba Mufti, PDP Leader
"Every imaginable solution has been forwarded (but) India and Pakistan see themselves, as too weak to make significant concessions, fearful that to do so would lead to more demands, and a slippery slope"
Stephen Cohen South Asia Expert
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
Converting the LoC, which was called ceasefire line before the Shimla agreement, into a permanent border and recognising Islamabad's legitimacy over territory it controls. What it would mean for India
- It dovetails with PM Manmohan Singh's "no-change-of-borders" solution
- It could allow India to focus on internal arrangements with the Kashmiris
- It all but nullifies Parliament's 1994 resolution seeking to reclaim PoK
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Goes against Islamabad's traditional stand on the implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions to ascertain the people's will on final resolution
- Would enable it to concentrate on nation-building rather than embroiled in a draining conflict
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Bad news for separatists
- Bad news for secular nationalists such as the JKLF, which seeks independent, sovereign status for undivided Kashmir
THE MIDDLE PATH
- Former Pakistan ruler Pervez Musharraf's 'out-of-the-box' formula, seeking to satisfy all parties and requiring all parties partially to step back
It seeks
- To demilitarize conflict-ridden parts of Kashmir
- Curb militant aspects of the "freedom struggle"
- Introduce self-rule and a joint management mechanism to oversee it
What it would mean for India
- In line with Delhi's stand that it wouldn't agree to change of the borders
- Fear of increased cross-border terrorism
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Fits Islamabad's stand that it can't accept the LoC as a permanent border
- Would call for loosened hold over Kashmir
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Acceptable to Kashmiri separatists
- Acceptable to chief minister Omar Abdullah
- Is seen to have elements of the state opposition People's Democratic Party's Self-rule formula
EUROPEAN MODELS
Solutions to Europe's many, successive 'Kashmir' disputes, such as Trieste, Northern Ireland, Sough Tyrol and Aaland. Each solution was based on
self-rule, greater economic access and open borders between the divided regions. Each conflict ended with the party in political control retaining this while the other was given economic access. In the
Kashmir dispute, New Delhi could have political control and Pakistan given economic access.
The state would have open borders
What it would mean for India
- Critics say it would mean more cross-border terrorism, difficult to sell domestically post-26/11
- In line with Prime Minister Singh's belief that greater people-to-people contact make borders irrelevant anyway
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Might be willing provided it continues with
Musharraf-era Kashmir policy
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Might find it viable, especially after demonstrating
overwhelming support for the opening of trade and bus routes across divided Kashmir
REFERENDUM
A plebiscite, under UN auspices, offering the choice of merging with India or Pakistan
What it would mean for India
- An outdated, possibly unworkable option in the changed realities of the region today
- Goes against News Delhi's position on the issue
What it would mean for Pakistan
- This has been Islamabad's long-held position on the issue
- Pakistan might find it hard to fulfil one of the basic
conditions before a plebiscite is held -- vacating portions of Kashmir that it occupies
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Anathema to Kashmiri nationalists because it does not offer the 'independence' option
ABROGATION OF ARTICLE 370
Stripping J&K of its special status for its "complete integration with India''
What it would mean for India
- A key demand of the opposition BJP
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Outright rejection
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Well supported in Jammu's Hindu-dominated areas and addresses their resentment to deals between the Centre and Kashmiri Muslims, which they regard as a "fait accompli"
AUTONOMY
Revoking all legislation enacted by Delhi and made applicable to J&K from 1953; greater autonomy for the state; devolution of more powers to the state to address Kashmiri "alienation". The PM's Working Group on Kashmir recommended restoration of
autonomy "to the extent possible" earlier this year
What it would mean for India
- It's within the purview of the Indian constitution
- The Union Cabinet rejected the J&K Assembly's autonomy resolution in 2000, saying it sets "the clock back and reverses the natural process of harmonizing the aspirations of the people of J&K with the integrity of the nation"
What it would mean for Pakistan
- Rejects the formula as it has no stake in it
- What it would mean for Kashmiris Is the main election plank of the ruling National Conference
- Rejected by Jammu-based and separatist outfits
Sir Owen Dixon's Formula
The former UN Kashmir representative suggested the "disputed territory's" division into three and separate plebiscites
What it would mean for India
- J&K's division along religious lines unacceptable to New Delhi
What it would mean for Pakistan
- In line with Pakistan's stand on the issue
What it would mean for Kashmiris
- Unacceptable to Kashmiri nationalists and Jammu-based parties
Text: Sameer Arshad, Times of India
'Kashmir is too complex for a cut and paste solution. It's a multi-dimensional problem and needs a bit of most of the solutions'
Mehbooba Mufti, PDP Leader
"Every imaginable solution has been forwarded (but) India and Pakistan see themselves, as too weak to make significant concessions, fearful that to do so would lead to more demands, and a slippery slope"
Stephen Cohen South Asia Expert
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
The cost of conflict-II: Beyond the direct cost of war
The military costs emanating from this conflict include human costs and policy losses that are rarely factored in, argues Semu Bhatt
The obvious cost .....more
The military costs emanating from this conflict include human costs and policy losses that are rarely factored in, argues Semu BhattThe obvious cost .....more
A 'desi' desire for Aman ki Asha
I believe in the two nation ideology and the national identity of Pakistan. I have met some Indians who are equally passionate about India. But we all want peace - for
.....more
I believe in the two nation ideology and the national identity of Pakistan. I have met some Indians who are equally passionate about India. But we all want peace - for
.....more
Pakistani, Indian schools finalise project for peace
By our correspondent
LAHORE: The delegation of students and teachers from India spent a busy day in the provincial metropolis on Monday while a joint project was also .....more
By our correspondent LAHORE: The delegation of students and teachers from India spent a busy day in the provincial metropolis on Monday while a joint project was also .....more
Indian, Pakistani students call for peace and love
By Khalid Khattak
LAHORE: Let us sow seeds of peace and love by shunning biases and prejudices and work together to share brotherhood and humanity. This was th .....more
By Khalid Khattak LAHORE: Let us sow seeds of peace and love by shunning biases and prejudices and work together to share brotherhood and humanity. This was th .....more
Pakistan, India urged to reap benefits of friendship
By Murtaza Ali Shah
LONDON: Echoes of Aman Ki Asha reverberated at the annual dinner of the Pakistan-India & UK Friendship Forum at the House of Lords here, as .....more
By Murtaza Ali Shah LONDON: Echoes of Aman Ki Asha reverberated at the annual dinner of the Pakistan-India & UK Friendship Forum at the House of Lords here, as .....more
Indian delegates term Aman Ki Asha a step in right direction
By Khalid Khattak
LAHORE: Aman Ki Asha is a step in the right direction. There is a need to involve the youth, especially children, in the peace process betwee .....more
By Khalid Khattak LAHORE: Aman Ki Asha is a step in the right direction. There is a need to involve the youth, especially children, in the peace process betwee .....more
Page 128 of 174
Special Editions
more editions
The News on Sunday Special Report: India Pakistan prisoners
We probably didn't need to do this Special Report. Newspaper stories don't matter when it comes to Indians in Pakistani jails and vice versa. In fact, 'vice versa' sums it up. We do to them what they do to us.
Except when the two countries decide to begin talking, yet again! This time a little before the foreign secretary level talks, some Pakistani prisoners were released by India (and vice versa must have happened) and some more were release....read more
Blog
more
For the past 2 years the Jang Group and Geo have been working on a project of great national interest; one that we hope will help usher in an era of peace and prosperity in the country and indeed, in the region. And one that hopefully all Pakistanis can be proud of.
The Jang Group has entered into an agreement with the Times of India Group, the largest media group of India, to campaign for peace betw
Global Media
Comments